When dealing with industrial systems that handle flammable materials, safety is always a top priority.
Fire-safe valves play a vital role in protecting equipment and preventing accidents in high-risk environments. Two key valve standards to consider are API 607 and API 608.
While both address fire safety, they serve different purposes and are tailored for distinct applications.
This article breaks down the differences between API 607 and API 608 to help you select the right standard for your operations.
Discover Onerovalve’s Fire Safe Industrial Ball Valve.
What is the API 607 Standard?
API 607 is a widely recognized fire-test standard designed for soft-seated quarter-turn valves, such as ball valves and plug valves.
The standard ensures that valves can maintain their sealing integrity when exposed to fire, minimizing the risk of hazardous leaks.
Key Features of API 607:
- Primarily applies to soft-seated valves.
- Tests the valve’s ability to prevent leakage during and after fire exposure.
- Focuses on applications involving flammable materials, such as oil and gas.
- Includes testing with pressurized mediums to simulate real-world conditions.
What Does API 608 Mean?
API 608 is a standard for metal-seated ball valves, emphasizing overall design, material requirements, and performance.
It ensures valves meet rigorous industrial specifications, including fire safety.
Key Features of API 608:
- Designed for metal-seated ball valves used in general industrial applications.
- Covers fire safety but with a broader focus on durability and performance.
- Suitable for applications beyond oil and gas, such as water treatment and chemical processing.
- Includes detailed testing for leakage and operational efficiency.
What is the Difference Between API 607 and API 608?
Here’s a detailed comparison of the two standards:
| Aspect | API 607 | API 608 |
| Applicable Valve Types | Soft-seated quarter-turn valves (e.g., ball valves, plug valves). | Metal-seated ball valves. |
| Test Temperature | Simulates fire temperatures up to 1000°F (538°C). | Similar fire temperature testing is included but with a broader focus on industrial requirements. |
| Sealing Tests | Focuses on maintaining a seal during and after fire exposure. | Includes leakage tests and overall durability. |
| Leakage Standards | Requires minimal allowable leakage during testing. | Ensures no leakage under specified conditions. |
| Test Medium | Typically uses pressurized gas or liquid during fire testing. | Broader range of testing mediums for various conditions. |
| Main Test Purpose | Validates fire safety for valves handling flammable materials. | Ensures valve integrity, operational efficiency, and fire safety. |
| Material Requirements | Requires fire-resistant materials for seals and components. | Specifies materials for durability and performance across industries. |
| Applicable Industries | Primarily oil, gas, and petrochemical industries. | General industrial applications, including water and chemical systems. |
| Installation and Maintenance | Focus on valves that are easier to service after fire exposure. | Emphasizes overall durability and ease of maintenance. |
| Cost Considerations | Slightly higher due to specialized fire testing. | Generally cost-effective for industrial use. |
| Industry-Specific Details | Tailored for highly flammable and hazardous environments. | Broader applications in less hazardous settings. |
API 607 and API 608 Certification Process
Ensuring compliance with API 607 and API 608 standards involves a rigorous certification process that guarantees valve performance under critical conditions.
Understanding this process is essential for manufacturers and industry professionals seeking to implement these standards in their operations.
Phase #1: Documentation and Initial Assessment
The certification process begins with the submission of technical documentation, which includes detailed valve designs, material specifications, and intended use cases.
Manufacturers must demonstrate how their valves align with the specific requirements of API 607 or API 608.
For API 607, the focus is on fire-testing procedures, while API 608 emphasizes general performance standards, including pressure-temperature ratings and leakage limits.
Phase #2: Prototype Testing
Once documentation is approved, prototypes of the valve are subjected to rigorous testing. For API 607, this involves exposing the valve to extreme temperatures simulating fire conditions.
The valve must retain its integrity and ensure minimal leakage during and after the fire test.
API 608 tests, on the other hand, emphasize general operational reliability and long-term performance, ensuring the valve meets pressure and flow requirements.
Phase #3: Third-Party Audits
Independent third-party organizations, such as the American Petroleum Institute (API) or accredited testing laboratories, conduct audits and verify that the manufacturer’s facilities and processes meet industry standards.
These audits often include on-site inspections and reviews of quality management systems.
Phase #4: Certification and Recertification
Once a valve successfully passes all tests and audits, it is granted certification for API 607 or API 608 compliance.
Manufacturers must undergo periodic recertification to maintain compliance, ensuring that their products consistently meet the evolving standards.
Global Standards vs. API Standards: How They Compare
While API 607 and API 608 are widely recognized in North America, other global standards also play a significant role in ensuring valve safety and performance.
Comparing these standards helps industries choose the most appropriate certification for their operations.
ISO 10497 vs. API 607
ISO 10497 is the international equivalent of API 607, focusing on fire testing for valves. Both standards evaluate a valve’s ability to maintain integrity under fire conditions.
However, API 607 is considered more stringent in some areas, particularly in its testing protocols for flammable and hazardous environments.
Industries with global operations often seek compliance with both standards to meet regional regulatory requirements.
EN 12516 vs. API 608
The European EN 12516 standard addresses pressure testing and valve design, similar to API 608.
While EN 12516 is more commonly used in Europe, API 608 is preferred in regions where American standards dominate, such as North America and parts of Asia.
One key difference is that API 608 places greater emphasis on the valve’s ability to handle a wide range of pressure-temperature conditions.
Adoption Across Industries
API standards are prevalent in industries like oil and gas, petrochemicals, and power generation, particularly in North America and the Middle East. Global standards like ISO and EN are more common in Europe and parts of Asia.
Companies operating internationally often certify their valves under both API and global standards to ensure compliance with diverse regulatory frameworks.
Why API Standards Stand Out
API standards are highly respected for their detailed and application-specific requirements. They are often tailored to the unique challenges of the oil and gas industry, making them a preferred choice in this sector.
Additionally, the periodic updates to API standards ensure they remain relevant in addressing new safety and performance challenges.
What Are 6 Mains API Standards For Industrial Ball Valve?
Fire Safe API 607 vs API 608: Conclusion
Choosing between API 607 and API 608 depends on your specific application needs.
If you’re working in high-risk environments like oil and gas, API 607’s stringent fire safety measures are essential.
For broader industrial applications, API 608 offers flexibility, durability, and fire safety.
Understanding these standards ensures you select the right valve to protect your operations and meet industry compliance.
English 
Portuguese 
Russian 
Korean 
Arabic 
Spanish 
Italian